Benefits of Reproductive Cloning
Original Paragraph:
1. Reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children
for people who cannot be helped by other fertility treatments (i.e., who do not
produce eggs or sperm).
2. Reproductive cloning would allow lesbians to have a child
without having to use donor sperm, and gay men to have a child that does not
have genes derived from an egg donor (though, of course, a surrogate would have
to carry the pregnancy).
3. Reproductive cloning could allow parents of a child who has
died to seek redress for their loss.
4. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it
is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction.
Key Ideas:
- Genetically related children for people who cannot be helped by other fertility treatments.
- Same gendered couples will be able to have children with their own genes.
- To resuscitate loved ones who has passed away.
- It is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction.
Source in MLA:
"CGS : Reproductive
Cloning Arguments Pro and Con." CGS : Reproductive
Cloning Arguments Pro and Con. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Oct. 2014.
The diagram on the right side of the picture demonstrates step by step on how reproductive cloning is done. |
Paraphrasing:
There are several benefits upon
the topic of reproductive cloning. The benefits include providing related
children for people who unfortunately are not abled to use other fertility
treatments, by using reproductive cloning they will be able to have the child
they have always wanted. It will enable same sex couples to have children with
their own DNA’s from their own genes not the ones from a donor, I believe that
everyone would want to either have their own genetic babies instead of an
adopted child. It will permit people to revive their love ones who have passed away;
this empowers them to regain love for the people who they have missed. According
to my research, it is arbitrated to have the same level of risks as natural
reproduction. However, everyone would think that natural reproduction would be
much significant.
Picture Link:
http://www.nature.com/nrg/journal/v4/n11/images/nrg1205-i1.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment